These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
379 related items for PubMed ID: 23768786
21. Multi-target assessment of advanced oxidation processes-based strategies for indirect potable reuse of tertiary wastewater: Fate of compounds of emerging concerns, microbial and ecotoxicological parameters. Murgolo S, De Giglio O, De Ceglie C, Triggiano F, Apollonio F, Calia C, Pousis C, Marzella A, Fasano F, Giordano ME, Lionetto MG, Santoro D, Santoro O, Mancini S, Di Iaconi C, De Sanctis M, Montagna MT, Mascolo G. Environ Res; 2024 Jan 15; 241():117661. PubMed ID: 37980992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Pilot-scale advanced treatment of actual high-salt textile wastewater by a UV/O3 pressurization process: Evaluation of removal kinetics and reverse osmosis desalination process. Wang J, Liu H, Gao Y, Yue Q, Gao B, Liu B, Guo K, Xu X. Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan 20; 857(Pt 3):159725. PubMed ID: 36302404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of operational and water quality parameters on conventional ozonation and the advanced oxidation process O3/H2O2: Kinetics of micropollutant abatement, transformation product and bromate formation in a surface water. Bourgin M, Borowska E, Helbing J, Hollender J, Kaiser HP, Kienle C, McArdell CS, Simon E, von Gunten U. Water Res; 2017 Oct 01; 122():234-245. PubMed ID: 28601791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive models for the degradation of 4 pharmaceutically active compounds in municipal wastewater effluents by the UV/H2O2 process. Shi Y, Shen G, Geng J, Fu Y, Li S, Wu G, Wang L, Xu K, Ren H. Chemosphere; 2021 Jan 01; 263():127944. PubMed ID: 32854006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process. Wang H, Zhan J, Yao W, Wang B, Deng S, Huang J, Yu G, Wang Y. Water Res; 2018 Mar 01; 130():127-138. PubMed ID: 29216480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of ozone and HO· induced conversion of effluent organic matter (EfOM) using ozonation and UV/H2O2 treatment. Audenaert WT, Vandierendonck D, Van Hulle SW, Nopens I. Water Res; 2013 May 01; 47(7):2387-98. PubMed ID: 23466219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of pre-ozonation on the H2O2/UV-C treatment of raw and biologically pre-treated textile industry wastewater. Alaton IA, Balcioğlu IA. Water Sci Technol; 2002 May 01; 45(12):297-304. PubMed ID: 12201115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Pilot-scale comparison of microfiltration/reverse osmosis and ozone/biological activated carbon with UV/hydrogen peroxide or UV/free chlorine AOP treatment for controlling disinfection byproducts during wastewater reuse. Chuang YH, Szczuka A, Shabani F, Munoz J, Aflaki R, Hammond SD, Mitch WA. Water Res; 2019 Apr 01; 152():215-225. PubMed ID: 30677632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficiency of ozonation and sulfate radical - AOP for removal of pharmaceuticals, corrosion inhibitors, x-ray contrast media and perfluorinated compounds from reverse osmosis concentrates. Mutke XAM, Swiderski P, Drees F, Akin O, Lutze HV, Schmidt TC. Water Res; 2024 May 15; 255():121346. PubMed ID: 38569355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Tertiary/quaternary treatment of urban wastewater by UV/H2O2 or ozonation: Microplastics may affect removal of E. coli and contaminants of emerging concern. Adeel M, Maniakova G, Rizzo L. Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan 10; 907():167940. PubMed ID: 37875205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ozonation of reverse osmosis concentrate: kinetics and efficiency of beta blocker oxidation. Benner J, Salhi E, Ternes T, von Gunten U. Water Res; 2008 Jun 10; 42(12):3003-12. PubMed ID: 18472125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhanced pharmaceutical removal from water in a three step bio-ozone-bio process. de Wilt A, van Gijn K, Verhoek T, Vergnes A, Hoek M, Rijnaarts H, Langenhoff A. Water Res; 2018 Jul 01; 138():97-105. PubMed ID: 29574201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of ozone-based AOPs on the removal of organic matter from the secondary biochemical effluent of coking wastewater. Ji Y, Wang C, He L, Chen X, Wang J, Zhang X, Du Q. Environ Technol; 2024 Apr 01; 45(10):1943-1955. PubMed ID: 36511617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Oxidative transformation of micropollutants during municipal wastewater treatment: comparison of kinetic aspects of selective (chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ferrate VI, and ozone) and non-selective oxidants (hydroxyl radical). Lee Y, von Gunten U. Water Res; 2010 Jan 01; 44(2):555-66. PubMed ID: 20015530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Combination of UV absorbance and electron donating capacity to assess degradation of micropollutants and formation of bromate during ozonation of wastewater effluents. Chon K, Salhi E, von Gunten U. Water Res; 2015 Sep 15; 81():388-97. PubMed ID: 26140990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Removal of pharmaceuticals from secondary effluents by an electro-peroxone process. Yao W, Wang X, Yang H, Yu G, Deng S, Huang J, Wang B, Wang Y. Water Res; 2016 Jan 01; 88():826-835. PubMed ID: 26610192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimization of ozonation and peroxone process for simultaneous control of micropollutants and bromate in wastewater. Phattarapattamawong S, Kaiser AM, Saracevic E, Schaar HP, Krampe J. Water Sci Technol; 2018 May 01; 2017(2):404-411. PubMed ID: 29851392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]