These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 23777657

  • 1. Suction catheter size: an assessment and comparison of 3 different calculation methods.
    Russian CJ, Gonzales JF, Henry NR.
    Respir Care; 2014 Jan; 59(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23777657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Physiological responses to endotracheal and oral suctioning in paediatric patients: the influence of endotracheal tube sizes and suction pressures.
    Singh NC, Kissoon N, Frewen T, Tiffin N.
    Clin Intensive Care; 1991 Jan; 2(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 10149098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Negative tracheal pressure during neonatal endotracheal suction.
    Kiraly NJ, Tingay DG, Mills JF, Morley CJ, Copnell B.
    Pediatr Res; 2008 Jul; 64(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18344905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Suctioning through a double-lumen endotracheal tube helps to prevent alveolar collapse and to preserve ventilation.
    Reissmann H, Böhm SH, Suárez-Sipmann F, Tusman G, Buschmann C, Maisch S, Pesch T, Thamm O, Plümers C, Schulte am Esch J, Hedenstierna G.
    Intensive Care Med; 2005 Mar; 31(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 15690150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Tracheal pressures during open suctioning.
    Vanner R, Bick E.
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Mar; 63(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 18289240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Is paediatric endotracheal suctioning by nurses evidence based? An International Survey.
    Rad LL, Carter B, Curley MAQ, Copnell B, Tume LN.
    Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Sep; 26(5):372-379. PubMed ID: 33938114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A 72-hour study to test the efficacy and safety of the "Mucus Slurper" in mechanically ventilated sheep.
    Li Bassi G, Curto F, Zanella A, Stylianou M, Kolobow T.
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):906-11. PubMed ID: 17255853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of prolonged mechanical ventilation with a closed suction system on endotracheal tube resistance and its reversibility by a closed suction cleaning system.
    Adi NA, Tomer NT, Bergman GB, Kishinevsky EK, Wyncoll DW.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2013 Nov; 41(6):728-35. PubMed ID: 24180713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Spontaneously breathing lung model comparison of work of breathing between automatic tube compensation and pressure support.
    Fujino Y, Uchiyama A, Mashimo T, Nishimura M.
    Respir Care; 2003 Jan; 48(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12556260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.