These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

415 related items for PubMed ID: 23809021

  • 1. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients.
    Hoşten T, Gürkan Y, Kuş A, Özdamar D, Aksu C, Solak M, Toker K.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal.
    Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Aug; 53(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19426239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Langen KE, Anderson K.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 22420717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A randomised comparison of the self-pressurised air-QTM intubating laryngeal airway with the LMA Unique™ in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Shah R, Ryan K, Jagannathan R, Anderson K.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 22670827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: a randomised study.
    Kus A, Gok CN, Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Solak M, Toker K.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 24632572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sommers K, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Shah RD, Mukherji II, Miller S, Voronov P, Seraphin S.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23189931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Anand LK, Goel N, Singh M, Kapoor D.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.
    Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agrò F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, Garcia de Lucas E, Capdevilla X, Brimacombe N.
    Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fiber-optic assessment of LMA position in children: a randomized crossover comparison of two techniques.
    Ghai B, Ram J, Makkar JK, Wig J.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2011 Nov; 21(11):1142-7. PubMed ID: 21689206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
    Oba S, Turk HS, Isil CT, Erdogan H, Sayin P, Dokucu AI.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep 05; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
    Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012 Sep 05; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery].
    Shi YB, Zuo MZ, Du XH, Yu Z.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul 02; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
    Jagannathan N, Sohn L, Sommers K, Belvis D, Shah RD, Sawardekar A, Eidem J, Dagraca J, Mukherji I.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct 02; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.