These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
374 related items for PubMed ID: 23810045
1. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Shinohara A, Motoyoshi M, Uchida Y, Shimizu N. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23810045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? Kim SH, Kang SM, Choi YS, Kook YA, Chung KR, Huang JC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Yang L, Li F, Cao M, Chen H, Wang X, Chen X, Yang L, Gao W, Petrone JF, Ding Y. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study. Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A. Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov 18; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Kook YA, Nelson G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May 18; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Park J, Cho HJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep 18; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep 18; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr 18; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. Yoshimine S, Nishihara K, Nozoe E, Yoshimine M, Nakamura N. Implant Dent; 2012 Dec 18; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun 18; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants. Landin M, Jadhav A, Yadav S, Tadinada A. Angle Orthod; 2015 May 18; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement. Sawada K, Nakahara K, Matsunaga S, Abe S, Ide Y. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug 18; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov 18; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of the primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic miniscrews. Son S, Motoyoshi M, Uchida Y, Shimizu N. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr 18; 145(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 24703286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple three-dimensional stent for proper placement of mini-implant. Felicita AS. Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov 12; 14(1):45. PubMed ID: 24326158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone plate and root length after maxillary expansion using tooth-borne and tooth-tissue-borne banded expanders. Lemos Rinaldi MR, Azeredo F, Martinelli de Lima E, Deon Rizzatto SM, Sameshima G, Macedo de Menezes L. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct 12; 154(4):504-516. PubMed ID: 30268261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Monnerat C, Restle L, Mucha JN. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr 12; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of tooth root contact on the stability of orthodontic anchor screws in the maxilla: Comparison between self-drilling and self-tapping methods. Iwai H, Motoyoshi M, Uchida Y, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr 12; 147(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 25836008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography. Miyazawa K, Kawaguchi M, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec 12; 32(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 20413451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study of buccal plate thickness of the maxillary and mandibular posterior dentition. Temple KE, Schoolfield J, Noujeim ME, Huynh-Ba G, Lasho DJ, Mealey BL. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep 12; 27(9):1072-8. PubMed ID: 26364803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]