These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
215 related items for PubMed ID: 23810056
1. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Azeredo F, de Menezes LM, Enciso R, Weissheimer A, de Oliveira RB. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway. Weissheimer A, Menezes LM, Sameshima GT, Enciso R, Pham J, Grauer D. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):801-13. PubMed ID: 23195366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes. Dalessandri D, Bracco P, Paganelli C, Hernandez Soler V, Martin C. Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):230-42. PubMed ID: 22315209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Avsever H, Özdemir T. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 22251553 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery. Abboud M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Orentlicher G, Wahl G. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Dec; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. de Waard O, Rangel FA, Fudalej PS, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Breuning KH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT. Yamashina A, Tanimoto K, Sutthiprapaporn P, Hayakawa Y. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 18606745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography. Araki K, Okano T. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J, Tee BC, Kim DG, Leblebicioglu B, England G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Barbato E. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 23294461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]