These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

154 related items for PubMed ID: 23816295

  • 1. Integrated 2D and 3D mammography.
    Sumkin JH.
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):e292-3. PubMed ID: 23816295
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P.
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
    Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Fantò C, Ostillio L, Tuttobene P, Luparia A, Houssami N.
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Screening mammography after autologous breast reconstruction is not beneficial.
    Barton MK.
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2015 Aug; 65(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25533748
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mammorgraphy reporting at Tygerberg hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
    Pitcher R, Lotz J, Ackermann C, Bagadia A, Davis R, du Plessis AM, Griffith-Richards S, Hattingh R, Wagener G.
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Jul; 104(7):456. PubMed ID: 25298984
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Measuring the Effectiveness of Mammography.
    Chen WY.
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1037-8. PubMed ID: 26501739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimizing Mammography Screening Intervals.
    Yi M, Hunt KK.
    JAMA; 2015 Oct 20; 314(15):1635-6. PubMed ID: 26501538
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
    Bicchierai G, Nori J, De Benedetto D, Boeri C, Vanzi E, Bianchi S, Kaur Gill M, Cirone D, Miele V.
    Breast J; 2020 Feb 20; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
    Ali-Mucheru M, Pockaj B, Patel B, Pizzitola V, Wasif N, Stucky CC, Gray R.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec 20; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Novel Technique Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy as a Tool to Achieve Negative Margins for Wire-Guided Partial Mastectomies.
    Beierle SP, Heidel E, Lewis J, Stewart E, McLoughlin J.
    Am Surg; 2016 Sep 20; 82(9):e236-7. PubMed ID: 27670531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of appropriate short-term mammographic surveillance in patients who undergo breast-conserving Surgery (BCS).
    Gunia SR, Merrigan TL, Poulton TB, Mamounas EP.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct 20; 19(10):3139-43. PubMed ID: 22872291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment.
    Apffelstaedt SP, Dalmayer L, Baatjes K.
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr 20; 104(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 25118556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up.
    Sztrókay A, Herzen J, Auweter SD, Liebhardt S, Mayr D, Willner M, Hahn D, Zanette I, Weitkamp T, Hellerhoff K, Pfeiffer F, Reiser MF, Bamberg F.
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Feb 20; 23(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 22932738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.