These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 2383213

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cochlear action potential tuning curves recorded with a derived response technique.
    Salt AN, Garcia P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1392-402. PubMed ID: 2229674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Latency and amplitude tuning curves of the N1 and N2 components of the cochlear nerve compound action potential.
    Henry KR, Sweet RJ, Price JM.
    Audiology; 1990 Sep; 29(3):122-34. PubMed ID: 2383212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC, Houghton JM, Keith WJ, Greville KA.
    Audiology; 1989 Dec; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR.
    Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Some otological differences between pigmented and albino-type guinea pigs.
    Harrison RV, Palmer A, Aran JM.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1984 Dec; 240(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 6487138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of compound action potential and cochlear microphonic two-tone suppression in the guinea pig.
    Remond MC, Harrison RV, Legouix JP.
    Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 8(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7142036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Offset AP masker tuning curve and the FFT of the stimulus.
    Henry KR, Lewis ER.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1354-62. PubMed ID: 3198871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R, Ptok M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Noise masking of tone responses and critical ratios in single units of the mouse cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus.
    Ehret G, Moffat AJ.
    Hear Res; 1984 Apr; 14(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 6746421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.
    Greenberg S, Geisler CD, Deng L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.