These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

220 related items for PubMed ID: 23847252

  • 1. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
    Volders D, Bols A, Haspeslagh M, Coenegrachts K.
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):469-74. PubMed ID: 23847252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM.
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, Thibault JB, Pien H, O'Connor OJ, Blake MA.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Dec; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, Blake MA.
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Detection of Focal Liver Lesions Using Abdominal CT: A Comparison of Image Quality Between Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction.
    Lee S, Kwon H, Cho J.
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1532-1538. PubMed ID: 27745816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic.
    Fontarensky M, Alfidja A, Perignon R, Schoenig A, Perrier C, Mulliez A, Guy L, Boyer L.
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 25848899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, Sato J, Akai H, Yasaka K, Kunimatsu A, Ohtomo K.
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 22538629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
    Padole A, Singh S, Lira D, Blake MA, Pourjabbar S, Khawaja RD, Choy G, Saini S, Do S, Kalra MK.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Aug; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.
    Jia Y, Zhai B, He T, Yu Y, Yu N, Duan H, Yang C, Zhang X.
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V, Riordan RD, Mitchell GR, Hyde C, Roobottom CA.
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Saini A, Gervais DA, Westra SJ, Thrall JH.
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Iterative Reconstructions in Reduced-Dose CT: Which Type Ensures Diagnostic Image Quality in Young Oncology Patients?
    Pauchard B, Higashigaito K, Lamri-Senouci A, Knebel JF, Berthold D, Verdun FR, Alkadhi H, Schmidt S.
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 28365232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Körner M, Reiser MF, Wirth S.
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Abdominal CT: an intra-individual comparison between virtual monochromatic spectral and polychromatic 120-kVp images obtained during the same examination.
    Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hosokawa T, Tanami Y, Abe T, Kuribayashi S.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25015416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.