These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1503 related items for PubMed ID: 23856626

  • 1. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Hassepass F, Kroeger S, Hocke T, Arndt S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
    Desmet JB, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Lambrechts P, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jun; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sound localization in unilateral deafness with the Baha or TransEar device.
    Battista RA, Mullins K, Wiet RM, Sabin A, Kim J, Rauch V.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jan; 139(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23329093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
    Snapp H, Angeli S, Telischi FF, Fabry D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech-in-noise and subjective benefit with active middle ear implant omnidirectional and directional microphones: a within-subjects comparison.
    Wolframm MD, Giarbini N, Streitberger C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 22569145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
    Kurz A, Caversaccio M, Kompis M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L, Claesson A, Persson M, Tengstrand T.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 76.