These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 2385845

  • 21. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I, Gratt BM.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR, Brand JW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS, Haiter-Neto F.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M, Shearer DR.
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A comparison of six intra-oral X-ray films.
    Conover GL, Hildebolt CF, Anthony D.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8617390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U, Schulze RK.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.