These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

531 related items for PubMed ID: 23869724

  • 1. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
    Habib TJ, Farr DR, Schneider RR, Boutin S.
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Offsetting the impacts of mining to achieve no net loss of native vegetation.
    Sonter LJ, Barrett DJ, Soares-Filho BS.
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):1068-76. PubMed ID: 24673499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S, Moilanen A, Tuominen S, Kotiaho JS.
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets.
    Moilanen A, Kotiaho JS.
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 32390216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
    Gissi E, McGowan J, Venier C, Carlo DD, Musco F, Menegon S, Mackelworth P, Agardy T, Possingham H.
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mining and biodiversity offsets: a transparent and science-based approach to measure "no-net-loss".
    Virah-Sawmy M, Ebeling J, Taplin R.
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Oct 01; 143():61-70. PubMed ID: 24866419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.
    Bode M, Tulloch AI, Mills M, Venter O, Ando AW.
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun 01; 29(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 25494874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of boreal-forest biodiversity.
    Mönkkönen M, Ylisirniö AL, Hämäläinen T.
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr 01; 23(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 18983601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluating the potential of biodiversity offsets to achieve net gain.
    Souza BA, Rosa JCS, Campos PBR, Sánchez LE.
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Aug 01; 37(4):e14094. PubMed ID: 37021395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantifying the impact of vegetation-based metrics on species persistence when choosing offsets for habitat destruction.
    Marshall E, Valavi R, Connor LO, Cadenhead N, Southwell D, Wintle BA, Kujala H.
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr 01; 35(2):567-577. PubMed ID: 32720732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.