These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

71 related items for PubMed ID: 2388406

  • 1. [MR imaging of adenomyosis].
    Yoshioka K, Okayasu T, Matsuoka S, Kasai M, Iida H, Yanagisawa T, Nakasato T, Tamakawa Y.
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Jun; 35(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 2388406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging.
    Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, Hendrickson MR, Winkler ML, Bachica JA, Stickler JE.
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):527-9. PubMed ID: 3562836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diffuse and focal adenomyosis: MR imaging findings.
    Byun JY, Kim SE, Choi BG, Ko GY, Jung SE, Choi KH.
    Radiographics; 1999 Oct; 19 Spec No():S161-70. PubMed ID: 10517452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging.
    Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Noma S, Kanaoka M, Nakano Y, Itoh H, Ozasa H, Fujii S.
    Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):111-4. PubMed ID: 3336669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis.
    Tamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K.
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):583-602. PubMed ID: 16564228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis with or without uterine leiomyomas with the use of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: midterm clinical and MR imaging follow-up.
    Lohle PN, De Vries J, Klazen CA, Boekkooi PF, Vervest HA, Smeets AJ, Lampmann LE, Kroencke TJ.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Jul; 18(7):835-41. PubMed ID: 17609441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging.
    Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Fujisawa I, Noma S, Sagoh T, Minami S, Yamashita K.
    Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):531-4. PubMed ID: 2704819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques.
    Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K.
    Radiographics; 2011 May; 31(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 21257936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in uterine disease].
    Kasai M.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jul; 42(7):711-8. PubMed ID: 2212809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The uterus: in vitro MR-anatomic correlation of normal and abnormal specimens.
    Lee JK, Gersell DJ, Balfe DM, Worthington JL, Picus D, Gapp G.
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 4034962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Changes in myometrial and junctional zone thickness and signal intensity: demonstration with kinematic T2-weighted MR imaging.
    Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Nakayama S, Nozaki A, Kabasawa H, Ito T, Sakahara H.
    Radiology; 2001 Oct; 221(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 11568324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Uterine neoplasms: MR imaging.
    Worthington JL, Balfe DM, Lee JK, Gersell DJ, Heiken JP, Ling D, Glazer HS, Jacobs AJ, Kao MS, McClennan BL.
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 3010375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Duration of dysmenorrhoea and extent of adenomyosis visualised by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kissler S, Zangos S, Kohl J, Wiegratz I, Rody A, Gätje R, Vogl TJ, Kunz G, Leyendecker G, Kaufmann M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 17397990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images.
    Kang S, Turner DA, Foster GS, Rapoport MI, Spencer SA, Wang JZ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1145-50. PubMed ID: 8615259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker.
    Tellum T, Matic GV, Dormagen JB, Nygaard S, Viktil E, Qvigstad E, Lieng M.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6971-6981. PubMed ID: 31264010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Physiological changes of the human uterine myometrium during menstrual cycle: preliminary evaluation using BOLD MR imaging.
    Kido A, Koyama T, Kataoka M, Yamamoto A, Saga T, Turner R, Togashi K.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):695-700. PubMed ID: 17729347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic endometriosis.
    Manfredi R, Valentini AL.
    Rays; 1998 Sep; 23(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 10191666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging of thymic epithelial tumors.
    Kushihashi T, Fujisawa H, Munechika H.
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1996 Aug; 37(3):191-259. PubMed ID: 8872410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: MRI features and surgical correlations of a rare but under-recognised entity.
    Peyron N, Jacquemier E, Charlot M, Devouassoux M, Raudrant D, Golfier F, Rousset P.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1144-1152. PubMed ID: 30159623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging.
    Manfredi R, Gui B, Maresca G, Fanfani F, Bonomo L.
    Abdom Imaging; 2005 Mar; 30(5):626-36. PubMed ID: 15886951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.