These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 23886407

  • 1. Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options.
    Hariri S, Chun S, Cowan JB, Bragdon C, Malchau H, Rubash HE.
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1625-33. PubMed ID: 23886407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T, Doi H.
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y.
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
    Miki H, Sugano N.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J, Krantz N, Bocquet D, Wavreille G, Migaud H.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R.
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
    Gondi G, Roberson JR, Ganey TM, Shahriari A, Hutton WC.
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997 May; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF, Nevelos J, Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Alipit V, Wagner TC, Mont MA.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA.
    Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Fujii M, Sato T, Iwamoto Y.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3342-7. PubMed ID: 20473596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F.
    J Biomech; 2006 Dec; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.