These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


405 related items for PubMed ID: 2389788

  • 1. Cost and acceptability of three syringe-pump infusion systems.
    Johnson MS, Pesko LJ, Wood CF, Reinders TP.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Aug; 47(8):1794-8. PubMed ID: 2389788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A financial evaluation of the Becton Dickinson 360 infuser system.
    Fiorenzo VJ, Kelly WN.
    Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jun; 22(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 10312122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of a multiple-dose syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.
    Hola ET, Cronin CM, DeMonaco HJ, Franco ER, Pauley SY.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Oct; 43(10):2474-8. PubMed ID: 3788999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pharmacy-initiated implementation of a syringe pump infusion system.
    Goudreau JB, Morrissey JM.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Mar; 42(3):584-7. PubMed ID: 3985022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Costing services: comparing three i.v. medication systems.
    Baker K, Evans CB, Tiburzi T, Nolan MT, Frost GL, Kokoski P, Arrington DM.
    Nurs Manage; 1993 Mar; 24(3):56-60. PubMed ID: 8455896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Conversion from minibags to mini-infuser syringe pumps.
    Wolfe M, Lawrence R, Plosker G.
    Can J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Oct; 43(5):243-5. PubMed ID: 10107926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Implementation and cost analysis of a syringe pump system for intermittent i.v. drug delivery.
    Colangelo A, Clark ST, Janousek JP.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Mar; 42(3):581-4. PubMed ID: 3985021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Syringes versus minibags as an intravenous admixture system: a comparison of cost and nursing preference.
    Gin A, Martens D, Dobson K, Hall K.
    Can J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jun; 40(3):81-5. PubMed ID: 10282581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of seven methods of preparing and administering small-volume injections.
    Smith CF, Amen RJ.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Sep; 45(9):1896-901. PubMed ID: 3228122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [The Baxter AS 50 syringe pump: a comparison with propofol-specific syringe pumps].
    Terai T, Tanaka M, Suzuki N.
    Masui; 2001 Jan; 50(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 11211760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Syringe size and flow rate affect drug delivery from syringe pumps.
    Weiss M, Hug MI, Neff T, Fischer J.
    Can J Anaesth; 2000 Oct; 47(10):1031-5. PubMed ID: 11032282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Flow rate, syringe size and architecture are critical to start-up performance of syringe pumps.
    Neff SB, Neff TA, Gerber S, Weiss MM.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Jul; 24(7):602-8. PubMed ID: 17261217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.