These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

382 related items for PubMed ID: 23910506

  • 1. Efficacy of corneal tomography parameters and biomechanical characteristic in keratoconus detection.
    Ahmadi Hosseini SM, Abolbashari F, Niyazmand H, Sedaghat MR.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Feb; 37(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23910506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG, Pförtner T, Bonthoux FF.
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
    Kamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes.
    Viswanathan D, Kumar NL, Males JJ, Graham SL.
    Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 25850703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intereye asymmetry detected by Scheimpflug imaging in subjects with normal corneas and keratoconus.
    Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Mannis MJ.
    Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):779-82. PubMed ID: 23263222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism.
    Kirgiz A, Karaman Erdur S, Atalay K, Gurez C.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30265255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, Orucoglu F, Kılıc I.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.