These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Changes of corneal topography indices after CXL in progressive keratoconus assessed by Scheimpflug camera. Kránitz K, Kovács I, Miháltz K, Sándor GL, Juhász É, Gyenes A, Nagy ZZ. J Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 30(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 24708090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Determination of corneal volume from anterior topography and topographic pachymetry: application to healthy and keratoconic eyes. Cerviño A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garcia-Resua C, Montes-Mico R, Parafita M. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 19821928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability. Labiris G, Gatzioufas Z, Sideroudi H, Giarmoukakis A, Kozobolis V, Seitz B. Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e258-62. PubMed ID: 23557430 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. Uçakhan ÖÖ, Cetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 37(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 21596255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Corneal Thickness and Volume Parameters of Subclinical Keratoconus Using a Pentacam Scheimflug System. Cui J, Zhang X, Hu Q, Zhou WY, Yang F. Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):923-6. PubMed ID: 26605668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, Valbon B, Fontes B, Schor P, Dupps WJ, Ambrósio R. Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R, Velarde GC, Nosé W. J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus. Kara N, Altinkaynak H, Baz O, Goker Y. Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM. Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of corneal topography and tomography in fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients for early detection of subclinical keratoconus. Thulasidas M, Teotia P. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 68(11):2415-2420. PubMed ID: 33120630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictive Analysis Between Topographic, Pachymetric and Wavefront Parameters in Keratoconus, Suspects and Normal Eyes: Creating Unified Equations to Evaluate Keratoconus. Prakash G, Suhail M, Srivastava D. Curr Eye Res; 2016 Nov; 41(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25803133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Corneal thickness measurements with the RTVue, Casia-2, and Pentacam devices in patients with mild-to-moderate keratoconus: a comparative study. Sun B, Zhang X, Sun L, Huang Y, Tian M, Shen Y, Ding L, Zhou X. BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan 26; 23(1):36. PubMed ID: 36703165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]