These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
217 related items for PubMed ID: 23912871
1. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of an ozonated oil with chlorhexidine digluconate and povidone-iodine. A disk diffusion test. Montevecchi M, Dorigo A, Cricca M, Checchi L. New Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 36(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 23912871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of ozone against periodontal pathogenic microorganisms. Huth KC, Quirling M, Lenzke S, Paschos E, Kamereck K, Brand K, Hickel R, Ilie N. Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Jun; 119(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 21564314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species. Kunisada T, Yamada K, Oda S, Hara O. Dermatology; 1997 Jun; 195 Suppl 2():14-8. PubMed ID: 9403250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed phase 2/ step 2 in-vitro test on basis of EN 14561 for standardised testing of the wound antiseptics PVP-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, polihexanide and octenidine dihydrochloride. Schedler K, Assadian O, Brautferger U, Müller G, Koburger T, Classen S, Kramer A. BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Feb 13; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28193164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Antiseptic Efficacy of Povidone Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Skin Preparation Solutions Used in Burns Surgery. Smock E, Demertzi E, Abdolrasouli A, Azadian B, Williams G. J Burn Care Res; 2018 Apr 20; 39(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 29897541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New in vitro model evaluating antiseptics' efficacy in biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection. Staneviciute E, Na'amnih W, Kavaliauskas P, Prakapaite R, Ridziauskas M, Kevlicius L, Kirkliauskiene A, Zabulis V, Urboniene J, Triponis V. J Med Microbiol; 2019 Mar 20; 68(3):432-439. PubMed ID: 30735113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. pH influence on antibacterial efficacy of common antiseptic substances. Wiegand C, Abel M, Ruth P, Elsner P, Hipler UC. Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015 Mar 20; 28(3):147-58. PubMed ID: 25614073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vitro Evaluation of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine against Outbreak and Nonoutbreak Strains of Mycobacterium abscessus Using Standard Quantitative Suspension and Carrier Testing. Cheng A, Sun HY, Tsai YT, Wu UI, Chuang YC, Wang JT, Sheng WH, Hsueh PR, Chen YC, Chang SC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2018 Jan 20; 62(1):. PubMed ID: 29061748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. Müller G, Kramer A. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jun 20; 61(6):1281-7. PubMed ID: 18364400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The battle against multi-resistant strains: Renaissance of antimicrobial essential oils as a promising force to fight hospital-acquired infections. Warnke PH, Becker ST, Podschun R, Sivananthan S, Springer IN, Russo PA, Wiltfang J, Fickenscher H, Sherry E. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct 20; 37(7):392-7. PubMed ID: 19473851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of povidone-iodine products against periodontopathic bacteria. Nakagawa T, Hosaka Y, Ishihara K, Hiraishi T, Sato S, Ogawa T, Kamoi K. Dermatology; 2006 Oct 20; 212 Suppl 1():109-11. PubMed ID: 16490986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial efficiency of mouthrinses versus and in combination with different photodynamic therapies on periodontal pathogens in an experimental study. Decker EM, Bartha V, Kopunic A, von Ohle C. J Periodontal Res; 2017 Apr 20; 52(2):162-175. PubMed ID: 27038101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of antiseptics by the modified phenol coefficient method: sensitivity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sasatsu M, Shimizu K, Noguchi N, Kono M. Biol Pharm Bull; 1994 Jan 20; 17(1):136-8. PubMed ID: 8148802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test. Block C, Robenshtok E, Simhon A, Shapiro M. J Hosp Infect; 2000 Oct 20; 46(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 11049709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial efficacy of eucalyptus oil and 1,8-cineole alone and in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate against microorganisms grown in planktonic and biofilm cultures. Hendry ER, Worthington T, Conway BR, Lambert PA. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Dec 20; 64(6):1219-25. PubMed ID: 19837714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bactericidal activity of 3 cutaneous/mucosal antiseptic solutions in the presence of interfering substances: Improvement of the NF EN 13727 European Standard? Salvatico S, Feuillolay C, Mas Y, Verrière F, Roques C. Med Mal Infect; 2015 Mar 20; 45(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 25779009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vitro evaluation of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. McLure AR, Gordon J. J Hosp Infect; 1992 Aug 20; 21(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 1355784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs. Nishimura C. Dermatology; 2006 Aug 20; 212 Suppl 1():21-5. PubMed ID: 16490971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]