These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
209 related items for PubMed ID: 23921089
21. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial. Rodel RL, Gray KM, Quiner TE, Bodea Braescu A, Gerkin R, Perlow JH. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Wang H, Hong S, Teng H, Qiao L, Yin H. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective randomized trial of absorbable staple fixation of skin grafts for burn wound coverage. Best T, Lobay G, Moysa G, Tredget E. J Trauma; 1995 Jun; 38(6):915-9. PubMed ID: 7602635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. Altman AD, Allen VM, McNeil SA, Dempster J. J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):514-520. PubMed ID: 19646316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty]. Hlubek R, Walder P, Káňa J, Salounová D. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014 Jun; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples. Fisher DA, Bengero LL, Clapp BC, Burgess M. Orthopedics; 2010 Sep 07; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Peleg D, Eberstark E, Warsof SL, Cohen N, Ben Shachar I. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep 07; 215(3):388.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27018465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical Staples: A Superior Alternative to Sutures for Skin Closure After Neck Dissection-A Single-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Study. Oswal S, Borle R, Bhola N, Jadhav A, Surana S, Oswal R. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec 07; 75(12):2707.e1-2707.e6. PubMed ID: 28881182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A randomized trial comparing skin closure in cesarean section: interrupted suture with nylon vs subcuticular suture with No '1' polyfilament. Shrestha A, Napit J, Neupane B, Sedhai LB. J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep 07; 11(25):240-3. PubMed ID: 24908523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul 07; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study. Højberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NJ. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug 07; 77(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 9740522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples. Dresner HS, Hilger PA. Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009 Aug 07; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N. Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov 07; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ropivacaine continuous wound infusion versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. O'Neill P, Duarte F, Ribeiro I, Centeno MJ, Moreira J. Anesth Analg; 2012 Jan 07; 114(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 22025490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of postoperative pain outcomes after vertical or Pfannenstiel incision for major gynecologic surgery. Habib AS, Wahl K, Gu J, Gan TJ, Adenosine Study Group. Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun 07; 25(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 19438408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Schuster M, Berghella V. Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 01; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Renal transplant incision closure using new absorbable subcuticular staple device. Tellis VA. Clin Transplant; 2007 Aug 01; 21(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 17488393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status. Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Aug 01; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]