These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

635 related items for PubMed ID: 23924292

  • 1. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R, Van de Venne M, Macleod M, Strachan B, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomised controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496.
    Ramphul M, Kennelly MM, Burke G, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 25414081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
    Tempest N, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Hapangama DK.
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery According to Fetal Head Station.
    Ducarme G, Hamel JF, Bouet PE, Legendre G, Vandenbroucke L, Sentilhes L.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 126(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 26244539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, Feraud O, Simon-Toulza C, Sentilhes L, Meunier E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Riethmuller D, Baud O, Galley-Raulin F, Diemunsch P, Pierre F, Schaal JP, Fournié A, Oury JF, French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS, Premaratne S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA, García-Mejido JA, Aquise A, Borrero C, Bonomi MJ, Fernández-Palacín A.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A, Al-Najdawi W.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001 Feb; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
    Tan KH, Sim R, Yam KL.
    Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C, Taylor M, Benedetti T, Hitti J, Critchlow C.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Kielland vs. nonrotational forceps for the second stage of labor.
    Krivak TC, Drewes P, Horowitz GM.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Jun; 44(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 10394545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery.
    Youssef R, Ramalingam U, Macleod M, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 15957996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after first vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas.
    Mazouni C, Bretelle F, Collette E, Heckenroth H, Bonnier P, Gamerre M.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 16171477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.
    Gauthaman N, Henry D, Ster IC, Khunda A, Doumouchtsis SK.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH, Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Maulik D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.