These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
229 related items for PubMed ID: 23925323
21. Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry. Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):954-64. PubMed ID: 20494767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Pellucid marginal degeneration versus keratoconus: distinction with wide-field SD-OCT corneal sublayer pachymetry. Mohr N, Shajari M, Krause D, Kassumeh S, Siedlecki J, Priglinger SG, Mayer WJ, Luft N. Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 105(12):1638-1644. PubMed ID: 33055086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. Jafarinasab MR, Feizi S, Karimian F, Hasanpour H. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 23(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 23335313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification. Kamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconus using swept-source optical coherence tomography and combined Placido-Scheimpflug imaging. Chan TCY, Biswas S, Yu M, Jhanji V. Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 95(6):e486-e494. PubMed ID: 27805316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Evolution Profiles of Different Corneal Parameters in Progressive Keratoconus. Tellouck J, Touboul D, Santhiago MR, Tellouck L, Paya C, Smadja D. Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 27078004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Characteristics of keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration in mean curvature maps. Tang M, Shekhar R, Miranda D, Huang D. Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 140(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 16376641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Keratoconus: Diagnosis and Staging. Belin MW, Jang HS, Borgstrom M. Cornea; 2022 Jan 01; 41(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 34116536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis. Nilforoushan MR, Speaker M, Marmor M, Abramson J, Tullo W, Morschauser D, Latkany R. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr 01; 34(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 18361985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Vertical D: a novel topographic pattern in some keratoconus suspects. Abad JC, Rubinfeld RS, Del Valle M, Belin MW, Kurstin JM. Ophthalmology; 2007 May 01; 114(5):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17292474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Corneal thickness measurements using time-domain anterior segment OCT, ultrasound, and Scheimpflug tomographer pachymetry before and after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. Mencucci R, Paladini I, Virgili G, Giacomelli G, Menchini U. J Refract Surg; 2012 Aug 01; 28(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 22785060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, Krueger RR, Colin J, Touboul D. J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr 01; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of Scheimpflug corneal anterior-posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation. Miyata K, Otani S, Honbou N, Minami K. Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov 01; 91(7):e546-9. PubMed ID: 23890181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of corneal elevation and thickness indices in pellucid marginal degeneration and keratoconus. Tummanapalli SS, Maseedupally V, Mandathara P, Rathi VM, Sangwan VS. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan 01; 39(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 23107832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Corneal topography in clinical practice. Ghemame M, Charpentier P, Mouriaux F. J Fr Ophtalmol; 2019 Dec 01; 42(10):e439-e451. PubMed ID: 31727328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G. Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov 01; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep 01; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system. Montalbán R, Alió JL, Javaloy J, Piñero DP. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb 01; 39(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 23218818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis. Hwang ES, Perez-Straziota CE, Kim SW, Santhiago MR, Randleman JB. Ophthalmology; 2018 Dec 01; 125(12):1862-1871. PubMed ID: 30055838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]