These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
361 related items for PubMed ID: 23927831
21. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections. Hou W, Sun X, Wang Z, Zhang Y. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug 17; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Staphylococcal biofilms impair wound healing by delaying reepithelialization in a murine cutaneous wound model. Schierle CF, De la Garza M, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD. Wound Repair Regen; 2009 Aug 17; 17(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 19660043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds. Percival SL, Hill KE, Williams DW, Hooper SJ, Thomas DW, Costerton JW. Wound Repair Regen; 2012 Aug 17; 20(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 22985037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Activity of Norspermidine on Bacterial Biofilms of Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Isolates Associated with Persistent Extremity Wound Infections. Cardile AP, Woodbury RL, Sanchez CJ, Becerra SC, Garcia RA, Mende K, Wenke JC, Akers KS. Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017 Aug 17; 973():53-70. PubMed ID: 27864804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of desiccation to treat Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-infected wounds. Park E, Long SA, Seth AK, Geringer M, Xu W, Chavez-Munoz C, Leung K, Hong SJ, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. Wound Repair Regen; 2016 Mar 17; 24(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 26519217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities. Hill KE, Malic S, McKee R, Rennison T, Harding KG, Williams DW, Thomas DW. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun 17; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Combinatorial effects of antibiotics and enzymes against dual-species Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the wound-like medium. Fanaei Pirlar R, Emaneini M, Beigverdi R, Banar M, B van Leeuwen W, Jabalameli F. PLoS One; 2020 Jun 17; 15(6):e0235093. PubMed ID: 32584878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrical stimulation disrupts biofilms in a human wound model and reveals the potential for monitoring treatment response with volatile biomarkers. Ashrafi M, Novak-Frazer L, Morris J, Baguneid M, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Bayat A. Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jan 17; 27(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 30320423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of short exposure times of antimicrobial wound solutions against microbial biofilms: from in vitro to in vivo. Johani K, Malone M, Jensen SO, Dickson HG, Gosbell IB, Hu H, Yang Q, Schultz G, Vickery K. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 Feb 01; 73(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 29165561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a novel, highly quantitative in vivo model for the study of biofilm-impaired cutaneous wound healing. Gurjala AN, Geringer MR, Seth AK, Hong SJ, Smeltzer MS, Galiano RD, Leung KP, Mustoe TA. Wound Repair Regen; 2011 Feb 01; 19(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 21518094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative analysis of single-species and polybacterial wound biofilms using a quantitative, in vivo, rabbit ear model. Seth AK, Geringer MR, Hong SJ, Leung KP, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. PLoS One; 2012 Feb 01; 7(8):e42897. PubMed ID: 22905182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Controlling methicillin resistant Staphyloccocus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections with a novel biomaterial. Martineau L, Davis SC, Peng HT, Hung A. J Invest Surg; 2007 Feb 01; 20(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 17710602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds. Zhao G, Hochwalt PC, Usui ML, Underwood RA, Singh PK, James GA, Stewart PS, Fleckman P, Olerud JE. Wound Repair Regen; 2010 Feb 01; 18(5):467-77. PubMed ID: 20731798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro Multi-Species Biofilms of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Their Host Interaction during In vivo Colonization of an Otitis Media Rat Model. Yadav MK, Chae SW, Go YY, Im GJ, Song JJ. Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2017 Feb 01; 7():125. PubMed ID: 28459043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants. Phillips PL, Yang Q, Davis S, Sampson EM, Azeke JI, Hamad A, Schultz GS. Int Wound J; 2015 Aug 01; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A wound-isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa grows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualized by light microscopy. Harrison-Balestra C, Cazzaniga AL, Davis SC, Mertz PM. Dermatol Surg; 2003 Jun 01; 29(6):631-5. PubMed ID: 12786708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Histopathological comparisons of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa experimental infected porcine burn wounds. Chaney SB, Ganesh K, Mathew-Steiner S, Stromberg P, Roy S, Sen CK, Wozniak DJ. Wound Repair Regen; 2017 May 01; 25(3):541-549. PubMed ID: 28466497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. van der Plas MJ, Jukema GN, Wai SW, Dogterom-Ballering HC, Lagendijk EL, van Gulpen C, van Dissel JT, Bloemberg GV, Nibbering PH. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan 29; 61(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 17965032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Interference of Pseudomonas aeruginosa signalling and biofilm formation for infection control. Bjarnsholt T, Tolker-Nielsen T, Høiby N, Givskov M. Expert Rev Mol Med; 2010 Apr 07; 12():e11. PubMed ID: 20370936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]