These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

326 related items for PubMed ID: 23943628

  • 1. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
    Cha JG, Yoo JH, Rhee SJ, Hwang SS, Han JK.
    Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH, Park HJ, Lee SY, Chung EC, Choi SH, Yun JS, Rho MH.
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. High-resolution proton density weighted three-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) of the knee with IDEAL at 1.5 Tesla: comparison with 3D-FSE and 2D-FSE--initial experience.
    McMahon CJ, Madhuranthakam AJ, Wu JS, Yablon CM, Wei JL, Rofsky NM, Hochman MG.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 35(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 22034221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
    Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Woods M, Del Rio AM, De Smet AA, Reeder SB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
    Ristow O, Stehling C, Krug R, Steinbach L, Sabo G, Ambekar A, Huber M, Link TM.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jan; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM, Peng WJ, Wu H, Kacher D, Xia LM, Ai F, Li F, Xiong W.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov 05; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H, Yu W, Wang W, Liao Y.
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct 05; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG, Peters TL, Muscoreil SJ, Ratner LM, Wagle WA, Cousins JP, Rifkin MD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct 05; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA, Steines D, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Winalski CS, Lang P.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov 05; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K, Ojala R, Blanco-Sequeiros R, Tervonen O.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug 05; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
    Bauer JS, Krause SJ, Ross CJ, Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Ozhinsky E, Majumdar S, Link TM.
    Radiology; 2006 Nov 05; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R, Lu A, Block W, Grist T.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul 05; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
    Vasnawala SS, Pauly JM, Nishimura DG, Gold GE.
    Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct 05; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T.
    Siepmann DB, McGovern J, Brittain JH, Reeder SB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec 05; 189(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18029893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of IDEAL-SPGR volume sequence to standard MR sequences in the detection and grading of cartilage lesions.
    Blankenbaker DG, Ullrick SR, Kijowski R, Davis KW, De Smet AA, Shinki K, Muñoz del Rio A, Keene JS.
    Radiology; 2011 Dec 05; 261(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 21900621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG, McCauley TR, Wirth CR, Fuchs MD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug 05; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.