These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
207 related items for PubMed ID: 2397950
1. Short notes on intrauterine devices. Indian J Med Sci; 1990 May; 44(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 2397950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The rise and fall and rise of the IUD. Burnhill MS. Am J Gynecol Health; 1989 May; 3(3-S):6-10. PubMed ID: 12285000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience with two different medicated intrauterine devices: a comparative study of the Progestasert and Nova-T. Fylling P, Fagerhol M. Fertil Steril; 1979 Feb; 31(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 761675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs. Chi IC. Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun 14; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Current status of intrauterine devices. II. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy. Malhotra N, Chaudhury RR. Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Jan 14; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7054735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method? Fortney JA, Feldblum PJ, Raymond EG. J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar 14; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experience with today's IUDs. Pasquale S. Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1996 Dec 14; 51(12 Suppl):S25-9. PubMed ID: 8972499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices. Sivin I, Stern J, Diaz J, Diaz MM, Faundes A, el Mahgoub S, Diaz S, Pavez M, Coutinho E, Mattos CE. Contraception; 1987 Mar 14; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine devices: present and future. Guillebaud J. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980 Mar 14; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 6110576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The intrauterine device today. Rioux JE. J SOGC; 1993 Oct 14; 15(8):921-4. PubMed ID: 12318529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine contraception. Reinprayoon D. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug 14; 4(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 1324024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study. Nilsson CG, Allonen H, Diaz J, Luukkainen T. Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb 14; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries. Farr G, Amatya R, Acosta M, Ekwempu C, Kisninci H. Contraception; 1995 Jul 14; 52(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8521710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The effect of intrauterine contraceptive devices on the endometrium]. Sheppard BL, Bonnar J. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Nov 14; 15(11):1015-24. PubMed ID: 12341565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]