These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

239 related items for PubMed ID: 23982454

  • 1. Absolute myocardial flow quantification with (82)Rb PET/CT: comparison of different software packages and methods.
    Tahari AK, Lee A, Rajaram M, Fukushima K, Lodge MA, Lee BC, Ficaro EP, Nekolla S, Klein R, deKemp RA, Wahl RL, Bengel FM, Bravo PE.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jan; 41(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 23982454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intersoftware variability impacts classification of cardiac PET exams.
    Oliveira JB, Sen YM, Wechalekar K.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):2007-2012. PubMed ID: 30238299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.
    Sunderland JJ, Pan XB, Declerck J, Menda Y.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25294436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Test-retest repeatability and software reproducibility of myocardial flow measurements using rest/adenosine stress Rubidium-82 PET/CT with and without motion correction in healthy young volunteers.
    Byrne C, Kjaer A, Olsen NE, Forman JL, Hasbak P.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2860-2871. PubMed ID: 32390111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by 82Rb PET/CT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Zampella E, Acampa W, Assante R, Nappi C, Gaudieri V, Mainolfi CG, Green R, Cantoni V, Panico M, Klain M, Petretta M, Slomka PJ, Cuocolo A.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 29372272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Myocardial blood flow quantification by Rb-82 cardiac PET/CT: A detailed reproducibility study between two semi-automatic analysis programs.
    Dunet V, Klein R, Allenbach G, Renaud J, deKemp RA, Prior JO.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 25995182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for 82rubidium PET myocardial blood flow quantification.
    Lee BC, Moody JB, Poitrasson-Rivière A, Melvin AC, Weinberg RL, Corbett JR, Murthy VL, Ficaro EP.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Myocardial perfusion quantification with Rb-82 PET: good interobserver agreement of Carimas software on global, regional, and segmental levels.
    Nesterov SV, Deshayes E, Juarez-Orozco LE, deKemp RA, Sciagrà R, Malaspina S, Settimo L, Han C, Ryzhkova DV, Kostina IS, Gwet KL, Prior JO, Knuuti JM.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):507-514. PubMed ID: 35192160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Optimally Repeatable Kinetic Model Variant for Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with 82Rb PET.
    Ocneanu AF, deKemp RA, Renaud JM, Adler A, Beanlands RS, Klein R.
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2017 Jun; 2017():6810626. PubMed ID: 28293274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative relationship between coronary calcium content and coronary flow reserve as assessed by integrated PET/CT imaging.
    Curillova Z, Yaman BF, Dorbala S, Kwong RY, Sitek A, El Fakhri G, Anagnostopoulos C, Di Carli MF.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Oct; 36(10):1603-10. PubMed ID: 19387640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study.
    Nesterov SV, Deshayes E, Sciagrà R, Settimo L, Declerck JM, Pan XB, Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Slomka PJ, Germano G, Han C, Aalto V, Alessio AM, Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Nekolla SG, Gwet KL, deKemp RA, Klein R, Dickson J, Case JA, Bateman T, Prior JO, Knuuti JM.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1119-1127. PubMed ID: 25306543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and reserve (MFR) incorporated with a novel segmentation approach: Assessments of quantitative precision and the lower limit of normal MBF and MFR in patients.
    Liu H, Thorn S, Wu J, Fazzone-Chettiar R, Sandoval V, Miller EJ, Sinusas AJ, Liu YH.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1236-1248. PubMed ID: 32715416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantitative relationship between coronary artery calcium and myocardial blood flow by hybrid rubidium-82 PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Assante R, Zampella E, Arumugam P, Acampa W, Imbriaco M, Tout D, Petretta M, Tonge C, Cuocolo A.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):494-501. PubMed ID: 26780529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.
    Prior JO, Allenbach G, Valenta I, Kosinski M, Burger C, Verdun FR, Bischof Delaloye A, Kaufmann PA.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jun; 39(6):1037-47. PubMed ID: 22398957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.