These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

284 related items for PubMed ID: 23988483

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M, Murakami T, Juri H, Yoshikawa S, Narumi Y.
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hosokawa T, Tanami Y, Sugiura H, Abe T, Kuribayashi S.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H, Kockelkoren R, Kim T, Hori M, Nakamoto A, Tsuboyama T, Sakane M, Tatsumi M, Uranishi A, Tanaka T, Taniguchi A, Enchi Y, Satoh K, Tomiyama N.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Dec; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
    Singh R, Digumarthy SR, Muse VV, Kambadakone AR, Blake MA, Tabari A, Hoi Y, Akino N, Angel E, Madan R, Kalra MK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
    Khawaja RD, Singh S, Blake M, Harisinghani M, Choy G, Karaosmanoglu A, Padole A, Pourjabbar S, Do S, Kalra MK.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Mar; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
    Mello-Amoedo CD, Martins AN, Tachibana A, Pinho DF, Baroni RH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4).
    Schmidt-Holtz J, Laqmani A, Butscheidt S, Kurfürst M, Avanesov M, Behzadi C, Spink C, Veldhoen S, Nagel HD, Adam G, Regier M.
    Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
    Seki S, Koyama H, Ohno Y, Matsumoto S, Inokawa H, Sugihara N, Sugimura K.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
    Buchmann RF, Bruce Greenberg S.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014 Jun; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reducing the dose of CT of the paranasal sinuses: potential of an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
    Schaafs LA, Lenk J, Hamm B, Niehues SM.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Jun; 45(7):20160127. PubMed ID: 27351346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
    Wu R, Hori M, Onishi H, Nakamoto A, Fukui H, Ota T, Nishida T, Enchi Y, Satoh K, Tomiyama N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.