These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

407 related items for PubMed ID: 23990955

  • 1. Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation.
    Barnard S, Routray P, Majorin F, Peletz R, Boisson S, Sinha A, Clasen T.
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71438. PubMed ID: 23990955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Child feces disposal practices in rural Orissa: a cross sectional study.
    Majorin F, Freeman MC, Barnard S, Routray P, Boisson S, Clasen T.
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89551. PubMed ID: 24586864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India.
    Boisson S, Sosai P, Ray S, Routray P, Torondel B, Schmidt WP, Bhanja B, Clasen T.
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Aug 01; 7():486. PubMed ID: 25084699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Processes and challenges of community mobilisation for latrine promotion under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan in rural Odisha, India.
    Routray P, Torondel B, Jenkins MW, Clasen T, Schmidt WP.
    BMC Public Health; 2017 May 16; 17(1):453. PubMed ID: 28511653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessing patterns and determinants of latrine use in rural settings: A longitudinal study in Odisha, India.
    Sinha A, Nagel CL, Schmidt WP, Torondel B, Boisson S, Routray P, Clasen TF.
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Jul 16; 220(5):906-915. PubMed ID: 28529019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Long-term impact of a community-led sanitation campaign in India, 2005-2016.
    Orgill-Meyer J, Pattanayak SK, Chindarkar N, Dickinson KL, Panda U, Rai S, Sahoo B, Singha A, Jeuland M.
    Bull World Health Organ; 2019 Aug 01; 97(8):523-533A. PubMed ID: 31384071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study.
    Routray P, Schmidt WP, Boisson S, Clasen T, Jenkins MW.
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep 10; 15():880. PubMed ID: 26357958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Open defecation practice among households with latrines in rural communities of Ararso District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia.
    Ismail AM, Ibrahim MA, Abdi MM, Geremew A, Mulugeta Y, Ayele DM, Cheru A.
    Front Public Health; 2024 Sep 10; 12():1394351. PubMed ID: 38751595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study.
    Gebremariam B, Hagos G, Abay M.
    PLoS One; 2018 Sep 10; 13(9):e0203458. PubMed ID: 30192803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Measuring open defecation in India using survey questions: evidence from a randomised survey experiment.
    Vyas S, Srivastav N, Mary D, Goel N, Srinivasan S, Tannirkulam A, Ban R, Spears D, Coffey D.
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep 26; 9(9):e030152. PubMed ID: 31558454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effectiveness of a rural sanitation programme on diarrhoea, soil-transmitted helminth infection, and child malnutrition in Odisha, India: a cluster-randomised trial.
    Clasen T, Boisson S, Routray P, Torondel B, Bell M, Cumming O, Ensink J, Freeman M, Jenkins M, Odagiri M, Ray S, Sinha A, Suar M, Schmidt WP.
    Lancet Glob Health; 2014 Nov 26; 2(11):e645-53. PubMed ID: 25442689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of community led total sanitation and hygiene (CLTSH) implementation program on latrine utilization among adult villagers of North Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
    Gebremariam B, Tsehaye K.
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Aug 02; 12(1):478. PubMed ID: 31375135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A cluster-randomized multi-level intervention to increase latrine use and safe disposal of child feces in rural Odisha, India: the Sundara Grama research protocol.
    Caruso BA, Sclar GD, Routray P, Majorin F, Nagel C, Clasen T.
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Mar 18; 19(1):322. PubMed ID: 30885158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A cross sectional study: latrine coverage and associated factors among rural communities in the District of Bahir Dar Zuria, Ethiopia.
    Awoke W, Muche S.
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Feb 04; 13():99. PubMed ID: 23374236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of India's total sanitation campaign on defecation behaviors and child health in rural Madhya Pradesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Patil SR, Arnold BF, Salvatore AL, Briceno B, Ganguly S, Colford JM, Gertler PJ.
    PLoS Med; 2014 Aug 04; 11(8):e1001709. PubMed ID: 25157929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: The case of Machakel district in Ethiopia.
    Temesgen A, Molla Adane M, Birara A, Shibabaw T.
    PLoS One; 2021 Aug 04; 16(9):e0257813. PubMed ID: 34591873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural south India: an analytical cross-sectional study.
    Yogananth N, Bhatnagar T.
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2018 Jul 01; 112(7):349-360. PubMed ID: 30032253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Neighbour-shared versus communal latrines in urban slums: a cross-sectional study in Orissa, India exploring household demographics, accessibility, privacy, use and cleanliness.
    Heijnen M, Routray P, Torondel B, Clasen T.
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2015 Nov 01; 109(11):690-9. PubMed ID: 26464231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessing Latrine Use in Rural India: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Reported Use and Passive Latrine Use Monitors.
    Sinha A, Nagel CL, Thomas E, Schmidt WP, Torondel B, Boisson S, Clasen TF.
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2016 Sep 07; 95(3):720-727. PubMed ID: 27458042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Advantages and limitations for users of double pit pour-flush latrines: a qualitative study in rural Bangladesh.
    Hussain F, Clasen T, Akter S, Bawel V, Luby SP, Leontsini E, Unicomb L, Barua MK, Thomas B, Winch PJ.
    BMC Public Health; 2017 May 25; 17(1):515. PubMed ID: 28545427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.