These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 2399307

  • 1. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S.
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Sommer A, Georgi M.
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K, Lenzen H, Kamm KF, Link TM, Diederich S, Wormanns D, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 11818613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects.
    Ludwig K, Link TM, Fiebich M, Renger B, Diederich S, Oelerich M, Lenzen H, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K, Henschel A, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Wormanns D, Diederich S, Heindel W.
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.
    Ludwig K, Schülke C, Diederich S, Wormanns D, Lenzen H, Bernhardt TM, Brinckmann P, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
    Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Oestmann JW, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography: effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures.
    Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Spahn M, Völk M, Fründ R, Seitz J, Spies V, Alexander J, Feuerbach S.
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9438507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M, Breiter N, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H, Pärtan G, Urban M, Krampla W, Ottes F, Hruby W.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic].
    Dölken W, Chowanetz W, Horwitz AE, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Lackner K.
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Sickles EA.
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
    Schaefer CM, Greene R, Llewellyn HJ, Mrose HE, Pile-Spellman EA, Rubens JR, Lindemann SR.
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
    Müller RD, Voss M, Hirche H, Buddenbrock B, John V, Bosch E.
    Eur Radiol; 1996 Mar; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K, Ahlers K, Wormanns D, Freund M, Bernhardt TM, Diederich S, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K.
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Skeletal applications for flat-panel versus storage-phosphor radiography: effect of exposure on detection of low-contrast details.
    Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M.
    Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):506-14. PubMed ID: 15128995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.