These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 23995674
21. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses. Pereira PN, Sarian LO, Yoshida A, Araújo KG, Barros RHO, Baião AC, Parente DB, Derchain S. Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Predicting risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. McDonald JM, Doran S, DeSimone CP, Ueland FR, DePriest PD, Ware RA, Saunders BA, Pavlik EJ, Goodrich S, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell JR. Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 115(4):687-694. PubMed ID: 20308826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery? Valentin L, Ameye L, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Leone FP, Czekierdowski A, Lissoni AA, Fischerova D, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses. van den Akker PA, Zusterzeel PL, Aalders AL, Snijders MP, Samlal RA, Vollebergh JH, Kluivers KB, Massuger LF. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME. Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1098-103. PubMed ID: 15863550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcomes from ultrasound follow-up of small complex adnexal masses in women over 50. Suh-Burgmann E, Hung YY, Kinney W. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):623.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25068555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Imaging of Adnexal Masses. Thakur M, Timmerman D. Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 60(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 28005597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. CA 19-9 in evaluation of adnexal mass: retrospective cohort analysis and review of the literature. Sagi-Dain L, Lavie O, Auslander R, Sagi S. Int J Biol Markers; 2015 Jul 22; 30(3):e333-40. PubMed ID: 25704505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of adnexal masses with three-dimensional ultrasonography. Geomini PM, Kluivers KB, Moret E, Bremer GL, Kruitwagen RF, Mol BW. Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov 22; 108(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 17077239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses. Ruiz M, Labauge P, Louboutin A, Limot O, Fauconnier A, Huchon C. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct 22; 205():115-9. PubMed ID: 27583370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of adnexal mass: is unenhanced CT scan necessary? Jung SI, Park HS, Kim YJ, Jeon HJ. Korean J Radiol; 2014 Oct 22; 15(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 24497795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Adnexal masses in women with breast cancer. Tuncer ZS, Boyraz G, Selcuk I, Sahin N, Kaynaroğlu V, Ozışık Y. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Jun 22; 52(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 22486200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fischerova D, Lissoni AA, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Czekierdowski A, Jurkovic D, Savelli L, Vergote I, Bourne T, Van Huffel S, Valentin L. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug 22; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of tubo-ovarian abscess mimicking adnexal masses: Comparison between contrast-enhanced CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI. Fan H, Wang TT, Ren G, Fu HL, Wu XR, Chu CT, Li WH. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 22; 57(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29458901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease. Salem S, White LM, Lai J. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov 22; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods. Meys EMJ, Jeelof LS, Achten NMJ, Slangen BFM, Lambrechts S, Kruitwagen RFPM, Van Gorp T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun 22; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions with contrast-enhanced transvaginal ultrasonography. Szymanski M, Socha MW, Kowalkowska ME, Zielińska IB, Eljaszewicz A, Szymanski W. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Nov 22; 131(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 26254725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. D-dimer as a tumor marker in pre-operative assessment of adnexal masses. Worasethsin P, Narkwichean A. J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Nov 22; 96(11):1395-400. PubMed ID: 24428087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Management of the adnexal mass in pregnancy. Goh W, Bohrer J, Zalud I. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr 22; 26(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 24614018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Doppler ultrasound assessment and serum cancer antigen 125 in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Erdoğan N, Ozçelik B, Serin IS, Akgün M, Oztürk F. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Nov 22; 91(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 16083888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]