These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
431 related items for PubMed ID: 24024483
1. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy versus epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Wen D, Huang J, Li X, Savini G, Feng Y, Lin Q, Wang Q. Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 24024483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism. Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, García-González M. Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes following surface ablation techniques in a large population for myopia correction. Kulkarni SV, AlMahmoud T, Priest D, Taylor SE, Mintsioulis G, Jackson WB. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan 21; 54(1):609-19. PubMed ID: 23221080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Tobaigy FM, Ghanem RC, Sayegh RR, Hallak JA, Azar DT. Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec 21; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia. Kim JK, Kim SS, Lee HK, Lee IS, Seong GJ, Kim EK, Han SH. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul 21; 30(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 15210215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted. Zhou J, Gu W, Li S, Wu L, Gao Y, Guo X. Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan 21; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective bilateral comparison of epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia. Hondur A, Bilgihan K, Hasanreisoglu B. J Refract Surg; 2008 Nov 21; 24(9):928-34. PubMed ID: 19044234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up. Autrata R, Rehurek J. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Nov 21; 29(11):2105-14. PubMed ID: 14670418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, Durrie DS, Gordon M, Michelson MA, Thompson VM, Berkeley RB, Schein OD, Steinert RF. Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug 21; 105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3. PubMed ID: 9709767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. LASEK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: clinical and confocal microscopy comparison. Ghirlando A, Gambato C, Midena E. J Refract Surg; 2007 Sep 21; 23(7):694-702. PubMed ID: 17912939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Epipolis-laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia: a meta-analysis. Wu W, Wang Y, Xu L. Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct 21; 35(5):757-63. PubMed ID: 26253460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF, Hersh PS. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998 Oct 21; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]