These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1141 related items for PubMed ID: 24047949

  • 1. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL, Tamati TN, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN, Ray C, Vasil KJ, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR, Alexander JM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS, Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG, Faulkner KF.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Sep; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC, Mattingly JK, Castellanos I.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019 Sep; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.
    Faulkner KF, Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):582-94. PubMed ID: 26134725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
    Kim S, Choi I, Schwalje AT, Kim K, Lee JH.
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020 Apr 15; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun 15; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of High-variability Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN, Faulkner KF, Pisoni D.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2023 Sep 25. PubMed ID: 37748726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S, Cole SS.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Sep 25; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
    Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RC.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec 25; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Dec 25; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Selected Cognitive Factors Associated with Individual Variability in Clinical Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise Amplified by Fast-Acting Compression Among Hearing Aid Users.
    Yumba WK.
    Noise Health; 2019 Dec 25; 21(98):7-16. PubMed ID: 32098926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Dec 25; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 58.