These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S. Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation. Moosavi H, Sadeghi S. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar 01; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types. Winkler MM, Moore BK, Allen J, Rhodes B. Oper Dent; 1997 Mar 01; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison Of Frequency Of Post Operative Sensitivity In Amalgam Restorations Using Copal Varnish And Dentin Adhesive Liner. Saba K, Maxood A, Abdullah S, Riaz A, Din SU. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2018 Mar 01; 30(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 29938411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]