These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation. Morrow LA, Wilson NH, Setcos JC, Watts DC. Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro. Mathis RS, DeWald JP, Moody CR, Ferracane JL. J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [The influence of the chemo-mechanical removal of the smear-layer and the use of a dentin adhesive on microleakage of composite resin restorations]. de la Macorra García JC, Gómez Martínez A, Gutiérrez Argumosa B. Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Feb; 5(2):68-70, 74. PubMed ID: 2699414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Experimental use of dentin bonding agents and a cavity varnish to reduce marginal microleakage in high copper amalgam restorations]. Aras S, Cetiner S. Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2700122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations. Youngson CC, Holguin SM. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives. al-Moayad M, Aboush YE, Elderton RJ. Br Dent J; 1993 Nov 20; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Microleakage of dentin bonding systems used with spherical and admixed amalgams. Korale ME, Meiers JC. Am J Dent; 1996 Dec 20; 9(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 9545878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish. Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I. Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Dec 20; 8(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 8595104 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Microleakage of a copal rosin cavity varnish. Newman SM. J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Apr 20; 51(4):499-502. PubMed ID: 6587071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Sealing ability of materials used as retrograde root fillings in endodontic surgery. Thirawat J, Edmunds DH. Int Endod J; 1989 Nov 20; 22(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 2639873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study. Popoff DA, Gonçalves FS, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mjör IA. Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Nov 20; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Microleakage evaluation in amalgam restorations used with bases. Wieczkowski G, Yu XY, Joynt RB, Davis EL. J Esthet Dent; 1992 Nov 20; 4(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 1389340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. In vitro evaluation of two microleakage detection tests. Charlton DG, Moore BK. J Dent; 1992 Feb 20; 20(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1548388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study. Fourie J, Smit CF. SADJ; 2011 Aug 20; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro. Schmidlin PR, Huber T, Göhring TN, Attin T, Bindl A. Oper Dent; 2008 Aug 20; 33(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 19051855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of dentin pretreatment procedures on the microleakage of a dentin bonded composite resin material. Crim GA, Shay JS. Quintessence Int; 1988 May 20; 19(5):365-7. PubMed ID: 3077678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H. Indian J Dent Res; 2012 May 20; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Microleakage of four different amalgam binding systems]. Oberholzer TG, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, van Wyk Kotze TJ, Grobler-Rabie A. SADJ; 2001 Feb 20; 56(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 16894691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]