These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

284 related items for PubMed ID: 24053370

  • 1. The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction - a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy.
    Vannahme M, Mathur S, Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX.
    BJU Int; 2014 Jan; 113(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 24053370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Re: The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction--a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy.
    Cadeddu JA.
    J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):450. PubMed ID: 25035010
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
    Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, Pippi Salle JL, Farhat WA.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX.
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in malrotated kidneys in children.
    Jayakumar S, Antao BA, Ninan GK.
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2012 Aug; 22(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 22773352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children.
    Tan HL, Najmaldin A, Webb DR.
    Eur Urol; 1993 Aug; 24(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8365447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
    Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM, Chow GK, Leroy AJ, Slezak J, Patterson DE, Segura JW.
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD.
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endopyelotomy review.
    Bernardo N, Smith AD.
    Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Desai MM, Desai MR, Gill IS.
    Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Knoedler J, Han L, Granberg C, Kramer S, Chow G, Gettman M, Kimball B, Moriarty J, Kim S, Husmann D.
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1141-7. PubMed ID: 23510261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.
    Danuser H, Germann C, Pelzer N, Rühle A, Stucki P, Mattei A.
    BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Endopyelotomy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our 25-year experience.
    Kim EH, Tanagho YS, Traxel EJ, Austin PF, Figenshau RS, Coplen DE.
    J Urol; 2012 Oct; 188(4 Suppl):1628-33. PubMed ID: 22906656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Park J, Kim WS, Hong B, Park T, Park HK.
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
    Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Peschel R.
    BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following salvage intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Crivelli JJ, Johnson BA, Steinberg RL, Gahan JC, Antonelli JA, Morey AF, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2021 Oct; 47(6):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 34469674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
    Dobry E, Usai P, Studer UE, Danuser H.
    Urol Int; 2007 Oct; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY, Cho JS, Srinivasan A, Seideman CA, Huckabay CP, Andonian S, Lee BR, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR.
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.