These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 2405555

  • 1. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS, Thomsen HS.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan 15; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quality of urography and renal clearance of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Dorph S.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan 15; 27(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1733879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Renal clearance of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Nielsen SL, Fogh-Andersen N, Golman K, Dorph S.
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun 15; 26(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 1860763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I, Benn I, Benness G, Doust B.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun 15; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE, Fischer A, Rautschka E, Kollath J, Riemann H.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun 15; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Effect of renovascular roentgen contrast media on the function of the healthy kidney--an individual comparison].
    Zapf S, Scherberich JE.
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 Oct 15; 42(10):424-7. PubMed ID: 2573138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Quality control in urography using non-ionic contrast media (iopamidol) and induced hydration].
    Stacul F, Bazzocchi M, Zanella F, Abbona M.
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar 15; 72(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 3704214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Effects of urography performed twice at a close interval with contrast media on renal function and morphology in rabbits].
    Higashi S, Yasukochi H, Ishioka K, Sugiyama T, Narasaki K.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jul 25; 54(8):725-36. PubMed ID: 8072862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of high- and low-osmolar contrast media on renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate in euvolaemic and dehydrated rats. A comparison between ioxithalamate, iopamidol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
    Nygren A, Ulfendahl HR.
    Acta Radiol; 1989 Jul 25; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 2775601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM, Foster WL, Halvorsen RA, Dunnick NR, Rommel AJ, Bates M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb 25; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
    Katholi RE, Taylor GJ, Woods WT, Womack KA, Katholi CR, McCann WP, Moses HW, Dove JT, Mikell FL, Woodruff RC.
    Radiology; 1993 Jan 25; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Validity of iohexol clearance in patients with chronic renal failure and normal renal function in comparison to (99m)Tc-DTPA-clearance].
    Wiendieck E, Hartung R, Fünfstück R, Keil E, Gottschild D, Stein G.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Jan 17; 128(3):76-80. PubMed ID: 12529836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transfemoral digital subtraction aortography. Are diluted high osmolar contrast media acceptable?
    Naisby GP, Owen JP, Alexander TW, Cope L, Laker MF, Hamilton PJ.
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar 17; 32(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2031798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.