These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 24065947

  • 1. Application of the ex-Gaussian function to the effect of the word blindness suggestion on Stroop task performance suggests no word blindness.
    Parris BA, Dienes Z, Hodgson TL.
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():647. PubMed ID: 24065947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Temporal constraints of the word blindness posthypnotic suggestion on Stroop task performance.
    Parris BA, Dienes Z, Hodgson TL.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):833-7. PubMed ID: 22506782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hypnotic suggestibility predicts the magnitude of the imaginative word blindness suggestion effect in a non-hypnotic context.
    Parris BA, Dienes Z.
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 23778018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Oxytocin impedes the effect of the word blindness post-hypnotic suggestion on Stroop task performance.
    Parris BA, Dienes Z, Bate S, Gothard S.
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 9(7):895-9. PubMed ID: 23620599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Strategies that reduce Stroop interference.
    Palfi B, Parris BA, Collins AF, Dienes Z.
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 9(3):202136. PubMed ID: 35251674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Look into my eyes: Pupillometry reveals that a post-hypnotic suggestion for word blindness reduces Stroop interference by marshalling greater effortful control.
    Parris BA, Hasshim N, Dienes Z.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2819-2834. PubMed ID: 33423342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.
    Augustinova M, Ferrand L.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 22258821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Eliminating stroop effects with post-hypnotic instructions: Brain mechanisms inferred from EEG.
    Zahedi A, Stuermer B, Hatami J, Rostami R, Sommer W.
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():70-77. PubMed ID: 28077327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference.
    Raz A, Shapiro T, Fan J, Posner MI.
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2002 Dec; 59(12):1155-61. PubMed ID: 12470132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M, Silvert L, Spatola N, Ferrand L.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Can unconscious intentions be more effective than conscious intentions? Test of the role of metacognition in hypnotic response.
    Palfi B, Parris BA, McLatchie N, Kekecs Z, Dienes Z.
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():219-239. PubMed ID: 33387900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A, Abdel Rahman R, Stürmer B, Sommer W.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D, Risko EF, Besner D.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Steinhauser M, Hübner R.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 19803645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hypnotic color blindness and performance on the Stroop test.
    Mallard D, Bryant RA.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2001 Oct; 49(4):330-8. PubMed ID: 11596828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hypnosis and the control of attention: where to from here?
    MacLeod CM.
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 19969472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: a historical footnote.
    MacLeod CM, Sheehan PW.
    Conscious Cogn; 2003 Sep; 12(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 12941282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M, Ferrand L.
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task.
    Rubichi S, Ricci F, Padovani R, Scaglietti L.
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 15950883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Neurophysiological correlates of post-hypnotic alexia: a controlled study with Stroop test.
    Casiglia E, Schiff S, Facco E, Gabbana A, Tikhonoff V, Schiavon L, Bascelli A, Avdia M, Tosello MT, Rossi AM, Haxhi Nasto H, Guidotti F, Giacomello M, Amodio P.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Jan; 52(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 20187340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.