These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

407 related items for PubMed ID: 24071956

  • 1. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
    Formankiewicz MA, Waugh SJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct 23; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia.
    Bonneh YS, Sagi D, Polat U.
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun 23; 47(14):1950-62. PubMed ID: 17502115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC, Firth AY.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan 23; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Landolt C-Tests With "Fixed" Arcmin Separations Detect Amblyopia But Underestimate Crowding in Moderate-to-Severe Amblyopic Children and Adults.
    Waugh SJ, Fronius M.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2024 Aug 01; 65(10):33. PubMed ID: 39177974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of induced monocular blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching, and eye-hand coordination.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Kennedy SA, Colpa L, Chandrakumar M, Goltz HC, Wong AM.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul 01; 53(8):4354-62. PubMed ID: 22669718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of stimulus configuration on crowding in strabismic amblyopia.
    Norgett Y, Siderov J.
    J Vis; 2017 Nov 01; 17(13):5. PubMed ID: 29114805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R, Teichler G, Gräf M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct 01; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of visual acuity in adult patients with strabismic amblyopia: a comparison between the preferential looking method and different acuity charts.
    Rydberg A.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1997 Dec 01; 75(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 9527317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Local and non-local deficits in amblyopia: acuity and spatial interactions.
    Bonneh YS, Sagi D, Polat U.
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec 01; 44(27):3099-110. PubMed ID: 15482798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.
    Simmers AJ, Gray LS, McGraw PV, Winn B.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May 01; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Deficient maximum motion displacement in amblyopia.
    Ho CS, Giaschi DE.
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec 01; 46(28):4595-603. PubMed ID: 17098274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Crowding in children's visual acuity tests--effect of test design and age.
    Norgett Y, Siderov J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug 01; 88(8):920-7. PubMed ID: 21532515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E, Moschandreas J, Kontadakis GA, Pallikaris IG, Plainis S.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar 01; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.