These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
206 related items for PubMed ID: 24075425
1. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma. Talbot R, Goldberg I, Kelly P. Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss. Lee JM, Cirineo N, Ramanathan M, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Morales E, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 24200229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma. de Moraes CG, Furlanetto RL, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group. Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma. Rao HL, Yadav RK, Begum VU, Addepalli UK, Choudhari NS, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A. Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1610-5. PubMed ID: 20008716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers. Johnson CA, Sherman K, Doyle C, Wall M. J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability. Yohannan J, Wang J, Brown J, Chauhan BC, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY. Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Junoy Montolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct 09; 53(11):7010-7. PubMed ID: 22952121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss. Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF. Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun 09; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis. Park SC, Kung Y, Su D, Simonson JL, Furlanetto RL, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug 09; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavior of visual field index in advanced glaucoma. Rao HL, Senthil S, Choudhari NS, Mandal AK, Garudadri CS. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan 14; 54(1):307-12. PubMed ID: 23233259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]