These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 2407832

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The wear effects of selected composites on restorative materials and enamel.
    Embong A, Glyn Jones J, Harrison A.
    Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):236-40. PubMed ID: 3479359
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials.
    Lloyd CH, Adamson M.
    Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 3479357
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cermet--an ideal core material for posterior teeth?
    Burke FJ, Watts DC.
    Dent Update; 1990 Nov; 17(9):364-70. PubMed ID: 2097238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Surface wear on cervical restorations and adjacent enamel and root cementum caused by simulated long-term maintenance therapy.
    Rühling A, Wulf J, Schwahn C, Kocher T.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 15016258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M, Richards LC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ, Wild T, Jensen ME.
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Antimicrobial properties of glass-ionomer cements and other restorative materials.
    Scherer W, Lippman N, Kaim J.
    Oper Dent; 1989 Jun; 14(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 2628947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [The abrasion of deciduous dental enamel and dental restorative materials].
    Wada M.
    Shigaku; 1984 Apr; 71(6):1063-82. PubMed ID: 6591081
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC, Hart S, Johnston WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989 Apr; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.