These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1076 related items for PubMed ID: 24080948

  • 1. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E, Keidser G, Seeto M, Freeston K, Zhou D, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J, Ostevik A, Hodgetts B, Ho A.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distribution Characteristics of Air-Bone Gaps: Evidence of Bias in Manual Audiometry.
    Margolis RH, Wilson RH, Popelka GR, Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel de W, Saly GL.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Feb; 37(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 26627469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC, Smits C, Moore DR, Myburgh HC, Swanepoel W.
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Patterns of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation resulting from physical blow to the ear: a prospective controlled cohort study.
    Orji FT, Agu CC.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 20070761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How to eliminate air-bone gaps audiometrically: use too much masking.
    Miller MH.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2008 May; 87(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 18572783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ, Hendrix S, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
    Margolis RH, Saly GL.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy and precision of direct bone conduction measurements.
    Sadeghi AM, Flynn M, Davison T, Schulte M, Hillbratt M.
    B-ENT; 2016 Aug; 12(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27097393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.
    Ellison JC, Keefe DH.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):487-503. PubMed ID: 16230898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N, Kei J, Driscoll C, Charles B, Khan A.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
    Picard M, Ilecki HJ, Baxter JD.
    Audiology; 1988 Oct; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F, Swanepoel de W, Hall JW.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W, Mngemane S, Molemong S, Mkwanazi H, Tutshini S.
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.
    Blanchet C, Pommie C, Mondain M, Berr C, Hillaire D, Puel JL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 54.