These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
248 related items for PubMed ID: 24089918
41. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. Bernhardt P, Mertelmeier T, Hoheisel M. Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments. Segui JA, Zhao W. Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device. Samant SS, Gopal A. Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis. Berggren K, Cederström B, Lundqvist M, Fredenberg E. Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography. Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE. Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug 21; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography. Chen H, Danielsson M, Xu C, Cederström B. J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jan 21; 2(1):013501. PubMed ID: 26158077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography. Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Golinelli P, Acchiappati D, Gallo E. Med Phys; 2009 Nov 21; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of automatic dose rate control for flat panel imaging using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit. Dehairs M, Bosmans H, Desmet W, Marshall NW. Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul 31; 62(16):6610-6630. PubMed ID: 28632501 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Optimization of phosphor-based detector design for oblique x-ray incidence in digital breast tomosynthesis. Acciavatti RJ, Maidment AD. Med Phys; 2011 Nov 31; 38(11):6188. PubMed ID: 22047384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models. Liaparinos P, Bliznakova K. Med Phys; 2012 Nov 31; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography. Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Yaffe M, Alm Carlsson G. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul 07; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography. Ranger NT, Lo JY, Samei E. Med Phys; 2010 Mar 07; 37(3):962-9. PubMed ID: 20384232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Comparison of Contrast to Noise Ratio and Signal Difference to Noise Ratio Based on QA and QC Guidelines in CR Mammography]. Nagami A, Ishii M, Ishii R, Kodama S, Sanada T, Yoshida A. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun 07; 72(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 27320154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Effective DQE (eDQE) and dose to optimize radiographic technical parameters: a survey of pediatric chest X-ray examinations in Korea. Park HS, Kim YS, Park OS, Kim ST, Jeon CW, Kim HJ. Radiol Med; 2014 Apr 07; 119(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 24337757 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]