These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


308 related items for PubMed ID: 24094310

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia.
    Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):486-494.e1. PubMed ID: 22818905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.
    Efron S, Efron N, Morgan PB.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual Performance and High-Order Aberrations with Different Contact Lens Prototypes with Potential for Myopia Control.
    Martins C, Amorim-De-Sousa A, Faria-Ribeiro M, Pauné J, González-Méijome JM, Queirós A.
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Jan; 45(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 31314598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Optical quality and visual performance with customised soft contact lenses for keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A, O'Donnell C, Tromans C, Radhakrishnan H.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Sep; 34(5):528-39. PubMed ID: 24758229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Visual performance after overnight orthokeratology.
    Johnson KL, Carney LG, Mountford JA, Collins MJ, Cluff S, Collins PK.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17215162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Visual quality comparison of conventional and Hole-Visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering.
    Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, García-Lázaro S, Montés-Micó R.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 98(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 24246374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Radhakrishnan H, Montés-Micó R.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changes in refraction, ocular aberrations, and corneal structure after suspending rigid gas-permeable contact lens wear in keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A, O'Donnell C, Radhakrishnan H.
    Cornea; 2012 May; 31(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 22314817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D, García-Lázaro S, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of short-term light disturbance, optical and visual performance outcomes between a myopia control contact lens and a single-vision contact lens.
    García-Marqués JV, Macedo-De-Araújo RJ, Cerviño A, García-Lázaro S, McAlinden C, González-Méijome JM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 32885875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.