These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 24114234

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.
    Kelly MA, Roscoe EM, Hanley GP, Schlichenmeyer K.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 24604393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.
    Fleming CV, Wheeler GM, Cannella-Malone HI, Basbagill AR, Chung YC, Day KG.
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2010; 13(4):266-75. PubMed ID: 20629593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
    Roane HS, Vollmer TR, Ringdahl JE, Marcus BA.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD, Luiselli JK, Magnuson JD, Fillers S, Vieira S, Rue HC.
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.
    Lavie T, Sturmey P.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002 Jun; 35(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 12102143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
    Hagopian LP, Rush KS, Lewin AB, Long ES.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001 Jun; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Using videos to assess preference for novel stimuli in children with autism.
    Brodhead MT, Rispoli MJ.
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2017 Nov; 20(8):560-564. PubMed ID: 27739912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.
    Bukala M, Hu MY, Lee R, Ward-Horner JC, Fienup DM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Nov; 48(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 25688839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
    Carr JE, Nicolson AC, Higbee TS.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000 Nov; 33(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 11051581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of reinforcement magnitude on skill acquisition for children with autism.
    Paden AR, Kodak T.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):924-9. PubMed ID: 26281795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of tangible and social reinforcers on skill acquisition, stereotyped behavior, and task engagement in three children with autism spectrum disorders.
    Kang S, O'Reilly M, Rojeski L, Blenden K, Xu Z, Davis T, Sigafoos J, Lancioni G.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Feb; 34(2):739-44. PubMed ID: 23220050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.