These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

252 related items for PubMed ID: 24116438

  • 1. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
    Healy EW, Delfarah M, Vasko JL, Carter BL, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T, Grimm G, Kollmeier B, Neher T.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, D'Aquila LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jun; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S, Meis M, Schulte M, Kießling J, Walger M, Meister H.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S, Chen Z, Gerkmann T, Kollmeier B, Hohmann V, Ewert SD.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA, Kortlang S, Grimm G, Bisitz T, Kollmeier B, Ewert SD.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
    Huber R, Bisitz T, Gerkmann T, Kiessling J, Meister H, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment.
    Sullivan JR, Thibodeau LM, Assmann PF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):495-501. PubMed ID: 23297921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V, Roverud E, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
    Miller JD, Watson CS, Leek MR, Dubno JR, Wark DJ, Souza PE, Gordon-Salant S, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG, Wiinberg A, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr 13; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired.
    Stone MA, Anton K, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug 13; 132(2):1141-51. PubMed ID: 22894233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.