These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

231 related items for PubMed ID: 24117333

  • 1. Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling.
    Herman Hansen B, Børtnes I, Hildebrand M, Holme I, Kolle E, Anderssen SA.
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 24117333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults.
    Abel MG, Hannon JC, Sell K, Lillie T, Conlin G, Anderson D.
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2008 Dec; 33(6):1155-64. PubMed ID: 19088773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions.
    Kaminsky LA, Ozemek C.
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1869-76. PubMed ID: 23111061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.
    Feito Y, Garner HR, Bassett DR.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation of MET estimates and step measurement using the ActivPAL physical activity logger.
    Harrington DM, Welk GJ, Donnelly AE.
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Mar; 29(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 21360402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
    Santos-Lozano A, Santín-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Torres-Luque G, Bailón R, Bergmeir C, Ruiz JR, Lucia A, Garatachea N.
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.
    Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF.
    Obes Res; 2002 Mar; 10(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 11886937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
    O'Neil ME, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Forman JL, Trost SG.
    J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014 Mar; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Energy expenditure prediction using a miniaturized ear-worn sensor.
    Atallah L, Leong JJ, Lo B, Yang GZ.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jul; 43(7):1369-77. PubMed ID: 21200349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validity of the Actical activity monitor for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking.
    Johnson M, Meltz K, Hart K, Schmudlach M, Clarkson L, Borman K.
    J Sports Sci; 2015 Jul; 33(8):769-76. PubMed ID: 25356920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
    Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS.
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Sep; 14(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 21616714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions.
    Vanhelst J, Mikulovic J, Bui-Xuan G, Dieu O, Blondeau T, Fardy P, Béghin L.
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr 25; 5():187. PubMed ID: 22534207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor.
    Ried-Larsen M, Brønd JC, Brage S, Hansen BH, Grydeland M, Andersen LB, Møller NC.
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Sep 12; 9():113. PubMed ID: 22971175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Validation of five minimally obstructive methods to estimate physical activity energy expenditure in young adults in semi-standardized settings.
    Schneller MB, Pedersen MT, Gupta N, Aadahl M, Holtermann A.
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Mar 13; 15(3):6133-51. PubMed ID: 25781506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.
    Hänggi JM, Phillips LR, Rowlands AV.
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan 13; 16(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22749938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running.
    John D, Tyo B, Bassett DR.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb 13; 42(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 19927022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry.
    Van Remoortel H, Raste Y, Louvaris Z, Giavedoni S, Burtin C, Langer D, Wilson F, Rabinovich R, Vogiatzis I, Hopkinson NS, Troosters T, PROactive consortium.
    PLoS One; 2012 Feb 13; 7(6):e39198. PubMed ID: 22745715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Relationship between physical activity measured using accelerometers and energy expenditure measured using doubly labelled water in Indian children.
    Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Kuriyan R, Kishore RP, Wills AK, Nalinakshi M, Kehoe S, Fall CH, Kurpad AV.
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2009 Nov 13; 63(11):1313-9. PubMed ID: 19690580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Free-living energy expenditure in children using multi-sensor activity monitors.
    Arvidsson D, Slinde F, Hulthén L.
    Clin Nutr; 2009 Jun 13; 28(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 19345453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.