These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 24145558

  • 1. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S, Uzun S, Mocan MC, Bozkurt B, Irkec M, Orhan M.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standard automated perimetry versus matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in subjects with ocular hypertension and healthy control subjects.
    Lamparter J, Aliyeva S, Schulze A, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM.
    PLoS One; 2013 Oct; 8(2):e57663. PubMed ID: 23469043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.
    Han S, Baek SH, Kim US.
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep 21; 32(5):647-650. PubMed ID: 27404791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology to standard automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disease.
    Yoon MK, Hwang TN, Day S, Hong J, Porco T, McCulley TJ.
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep 21; 19(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 22623861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    Chiseliţa D, Ioana MC, Danielescu C, Mihaela NM.
    Oftalmologia; 2006 Sep 21; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep 21; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry.
    Racette L, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Ng D, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 21; 49(3):954-60. PubMed ID: 18326718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.
    Doozandeh A, Irandoost F, Mirzajani A, Yazdani S, Pakravan M, Esfandiari H.
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar 21; 6(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 29392149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Schuman JS.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar 21; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change.
    Meira-Freitas D, Tatham AJ, Lisboa R, Kuang TM, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Liebmann JM, Medeiros FA.
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Feb 21; 121(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 24289917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure.
    Nakagawa S, Murata H, Saito H, Nakahara H, Mataki N, Tomidokoro A, Iwase A, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan 21; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Conventional perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology, and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Corallo G, Cicinelli S, Papadia M, Bandini F, Uccelli A, Calabria G.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan 21; 15(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 16329058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography.
    Bayer AU, Maag KP, Erb C.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jul 21; 109(7):1350-61. PubMed ID: 12093662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ, Carolan J, Redline D, Taravati P, Woodward KR, Johnson CA, Wall M, Keltner JL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 21; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Prema R, George R, Hemamalini A, Sathyamangalam Ve R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar 21; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May 21; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep 21; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.