These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 24165303

  • 1. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Rasetshwane DM, Allen JB, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
    Rogers AR, Burke SR, Kopun JG, Tan H, Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.
    Burke SR, Rogers AR, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 20458246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
    Maxim T, Shera CA, Charaziak KK, Abdala C.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Aug; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
    Johnson TA, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Dierking DM, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.
    Scheperle RA, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):288-300. PubMed ID: 18646977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
    Wagner W, Plinkert PK, Vonthein R, Plontke SK.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.
    Richmond SA, Kopun JG, Neely ST, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3134-40. PubMed ID: 21568416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP, Nelson K, Davis T, Dorn PA, Neely ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA, Reed CM, Robinson SR, Perez ZD.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Apr; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L, Zettner E, Chang Liu M, Meuel Fernhoff C, MacPhee I, Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Oct; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance?
    Kirby BJ, Kopun JG, Tan H, Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Oct; 32(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 21057318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
    Bader K, Dierkes L, Braun LH, Gummer AW, Dalhoff E, Zelle D.
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
    Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Mascher K, Fletcher K.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA, Hoover BM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Growth in Aging Ears with Clinically Normal Behavioral Thresholds.
    Glavin CC, Siegel J, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):659-680. PubMed ID: 34591199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.