These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1125 related items for PubMed ID: 24168099

  • 1. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.
    Nakamura S, Matsumoto T, Sugimori H, Esaki M, Kitazono T, Hashizume M.
    Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 24168099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Pre-endoscopic assessment to predict outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding--a retrospective study in patients subject to emergency endoscopy outside regular working hours].
    Giese A, Grunwald C, Zieren J, Büchner NJ, Henning BF.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 May; 138(21):1096-101. PubMed ID: 23677503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does the AIMS65, a new risk score for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, work in Japan?
    Masaoka T, Suzuki H.
    Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):331-2. PubMed ID: 24754239
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with noncirrhotic extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis: a long-term follow-up study.
    Spaander MC, Darwish Murad S, van Buuren HR, Hansen BE, Kuipers EJ, Janssen HL.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 May; 67(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 18206153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB.
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 57.