These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

379 related items for PubMed ID: 24169374

  • 1. Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer.
    Eggemann H, Ignatov T, Beni A, Costa SD, Ignatov A.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 24169374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Surgeon performed continuous intraoperative ultrasound guidance decreases re-excisions and mastectomy rates in breast cancer.
    Karadeniz Cakmak G, Emre AU, Tascilar O, Bahadir B, Ozkan S.
    Breast; 2017 Jun; 33():23-28. PubMed ID: 28273552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Krekel NM, Haloua MH, Lopes Cardozo AM, de Wit RH, Bosch AM, de Widt-Levert LM, Muller S, van der Veen H, Bergers E, de Lange de Klerk ES, Meijer S, van den Tol MP.
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jan; 14(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 23218662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC, Chiang KC, Kuo WL, Shen SC, Lo YF, Chen SC.
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of an intraoperative ultrasonography-guided localization and tissue fixation device demonstrates less margin positivity during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer than standard preoperative needle-wire localization: a retrospective comparative analysis in a consecutively treated case series.
    Povoski SP, Jimenez RE, Wang WP.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24176781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery.
    Karanlik H, Ozgur I, Sahin D, Fayda M, Onder S, Yavuz E.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov 24; 13():321. PubMed ID: 26596699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Olsha O, Shemesh D, Carmon M, Sibirsky O, Abu Dalo R, Rivkin L, Ashkenazi I.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb 24; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin.
    Slijkhuis WA, Noorda EM, van der Zaag-Loonen H, Eenennaam MJ, Greve KE, Lastdrager WB, Gratama JW.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug 24; 158(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 27444926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: still much to be gained].
    Krekel NM, Haloua MH, Muller S, Bergers E, Rietveld DH, Meijers S, van den Tol MP.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012 Aug 24; 156(29):A3573. PubMed ID: 22831490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ultrasound-guided breast-sparing surgery to improve cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. A prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided surgery to traditional palpation-guided surgery (COBALT trial).
    Krekel NM, Zonderhuis BM, Schreurs HW, Cardozo AM, Rijna H, van der Veen H, Muller S, Poortman P, de Widt L, de Roos WK, Bosch AM, Taets van Amerongen AH, Bergers E, van der Linden MH, de Lange de Klerk ES, Winters HA, Meijer S, van den Tol PM.
    BMC Surg; 2011 Mar 16; 11():8. PubMed ID: 21410949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.
    Krekel NM, Zonderhuis BM, Stockmann HB, Schreurs WH, van der Veen H, de Lange de Klerk ES, Meijer S, van den Tol MP.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb 16; 37(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21194880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraoperative ultrasound versus mammographic needle localization for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    James TA, Harlow S, Sheehey-Jones J, Hart M, Gaspari C, Stanley M, Krag D, Ashikaga T, McCahill LE.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May 16; 16(5):1164-9. PubMed ID: 19267159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.