These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
303 related items for PubMed ID: 24171977
1. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study. Tegginmani VS, Goel B, Uppin V, Horatti P, Kumar LS, Nainani A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Ertuğrul F, Eltem R, Eronat C. J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 May 01; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations. Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ornerfeldt HO. Caries Res; 1990 May 01; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials. Lai GY, Zhu LK, Li MY, Wang J. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov 01; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D. J Dent Res; 1990 Mar 01; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci. Berg JH, Farrell JE, Brown LR. Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb 01; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Torii Y, Itota T, Okamoto M, Nakabo S, Nagamine M, Inoue K. Oper Dent; 2001 Feb 01; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct 01; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG. Am J Dent; 1997 Oct 01; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement. Croll TP. Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb 01; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Bruè C, Piccolomini R. J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar 01; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppä L, Luoma H. Caries Res; 1991 Mar 01; 25(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 1810658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro. Creanor SL, Awawdeh LA, Saunders WP, Foye RH, Gilmour WH. J Dent; 1998 Mar 01; 26(5-6):527-31. PubMed ID: 9699447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Influence of topical fluoridation of glass ionomer cements on inhibitory activity on cariogenic bacteria]. Płuciennik-Stronias M, Sakowska D, Krzemiński Z, Piatowska D. Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2010 Mar 01; 62(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 21473102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]