These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

387 related items for PubMed ID: 24177807

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA, Hutchison DM, McCormick TA, Varma DK, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
    Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May 02; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X, Wu LL, Ma ZZ, Xiao GG, Liu F.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug 02; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug 02; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M, Johnson CA, Zamba KD.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct 02; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression.
    Artes PH, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct 02; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar 21; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.